Effects Of Hormones On Breast Cancer - 835 Words

Lindsey Yee Berg Bio 110 22 July 2015 The Effects of Hormones on Breast Cancer Breast cancer is a popular disease that many people are afraid of. It is the growth of altered genes that create malignant tumors starting in a female or male’s breast tissue. Cancer has a reputation of being caused by hormones, but that may not always be the case. Hormones are chemicals that work as chemical messengers in the body and affect the duties of cells and tissues. The ovaries in premenopausal and postmenopausal women usually produce the hormones, like estrogen and progesterone. The hormone estrogen develops and maintains the female sex features and progesterone have to do with women s menstrual cycle and pregnancy. In a breast cancer cell, it†¦show more content†¦Like the Nurses’ Health Study, in 2002, a study called the Women’s Health Initiative published a theory that the breast cancer rates in the U.S decreased because of the reduced use of HRT. The results showed that HRT increased breast cancer risk (Breast Cancer Infographic). Because estrogen promotes the growth of cancers that are hormone-receptor positive, HRT is not a treatment for cancer but increases the risk of cancer because it is used to increase estrogen levels and hormone therapy blocks and lowers estrogen levels (The American Cancer Society) (Armstrong). The second therapy is hormone therapy. This therapy is said to treat breast cancer but is not used alone. Hormone therapy is usually paired with chemotherapy or radiation. Hormone therapy slows or stops the growth of hormone-sensitive tumors by preventing the production of hormones (National Cancer Institute). Breast cancer has cells with hormone receptor- positive. Estrogen makes hormone-receptor-positive breast cancers grow by reducing the amount of estrogen one can reduce the risk of hormone-receptor-positive breast cancers coming back (Armstrong). The most common hormone therapy drug that blocks estrogen development is Tamoxifen. This drug (often a pill) stops the hormone from binding to the breas t cancers cells, ultimately preventing the cell to divide and

Music As A Psychological Force - 1840 Words

Music as a Psychological Force â€Å"Music is the literature of the heart; it commences where speech ends.† French writer Alphonse de Lamartine immaculately summarized society’s preconceptions and widely accepted notions about music. Music is often incorporated in daily life, fluctuating from being used as a tool to combat silence and boredom, to acting as a method of expression for emotions, and events. However, the power of music is monumental, and the idea that it is so greatly entwined with numerous aspects of life serves to make music a volatile authority, acting as either a weapon, or a cure. Because music has such influence upon perception, emotion, and the brain itself, it can be used as therapy, or used to completely dismember the†¦show more content†¦Additionally, music creates movement by triggering motor areas in the brain, thereby solidifying music’s presence in the brain. (Vinther) Music provides sensations similar to that of drugs, or sex, as the same sections of the b rain are stimulated. (Fick, Shilts) The sensations created are due to the influx of dopamine, along with the plasticity of the neurons itself. Composers have latched on to this knowledge, creating songs that specifically delay the musical pattern established in the very beginning, which in turn causes the dopamine neurons to remain â€Å"in suspense†. The very end result is a greater, more powerful emotional response. (Lehrer) Conclusions can be derived that music provides a sense of euphoria, thereby explaining why society views it in such a positive manner. It also leads into exactly why using music as therapy is an obvious solution, yet contributes justification for how devious and deleterious weaponizing music is. Because music generates a sense of exhilaration, using it to heal someone aligns flawlessly with society’s notions of music; in contrast, for the same reason, manipulating music to destroy one’s sanity goes against the very idea society holds dear. Music as therapy is an idea that makes complete sense in correspondence with society’s perception as music as an enjoyable activity. In regards to therapeutic treatment, music can be used in a capacious manner, with treatments

King Vs.thoreau Essay Example For Students

King Vs.thoreau Essay King vs. Thoreau By acting civil but disobedient you are able to protest things you dontthink are fair, non-violently. Henry David Thoreau is one of the most importantliterary figures of the nineteenth century. Thoreaus essay Civil Disobedience,which was written as a speech, has been used by many great thinkers such asMartin Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Ghandi as a map to fight against injustice. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a pastor that headed the Civil Rights movement. He was a gifted speaker and a powerful writer whose philosophy was non-violentbut direct action. Dr.Kings strategy was to have sit-ins, boycotts, and marches. Dr. Kings Letter from Birmingham Jail was based on the principles ofThoreaus Civil Disobedience. Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry DavidThoreau are exceptional persuasive writers. Even though both writers are writingon ways to be civil but disobedient, they have opposite ways of convicing you. Dr. King is religious, gentle and apologetic, focusing on whats good for the group;while Thoreau is very aggressive and assertive for his own personal hate againstthe government. Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau have the sameideas, but view them differently. Dr. King wants to ultimately raise awareness andopen doors for the better of a group. Thoreau wants more individual rights forpeople. Dr. King is explaining his view of conscience:I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him isunjust, and willingly accepts the penalty by staying in jail to arouse theconscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing thevery highest respect for the law (Martin Luther King, p. 521). This quote shows Dr. Kings opinion on going to jail. King knows that he wasunjustly put into jail. He accepts going to jail even though he was put in jailwrongly. The community then knows of the injustice and should pressure thegovernment. The other thing that happens is King is respecting the law by obeyingit. He is a peaceful man and wants justice, but believes in following the rulespeacefully to get the job done. Thoreau feels that conscience plays a morepersonal role. Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decideright and wrong, but conscience? Must the citizen ever for a moment, orin the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has everyman a conscience, then. I think that we should be men first, and subjectafterward (Henry David Thoreau, p.581).Thoreau is questioning why majorities make the rules. He is questioningdemocracy. Hes telling us to question anything we do and why we should giveinto the government if we do not agree with a rule. Why should we be individualswith brains and have thoughts of our own if we are not allowed to think forourselves and do what we want? If we believe we are free, why do we have somany rules? Thoreau believes we should be real to ourselves and live forourselves, not the government. King wants to change the laws because they aremorally wrong and Thoreau wants to change the law because he personallydoesnt like it. Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King both agree injustice exists. Thoreau thinks of injustice as friction or tension that can wear the machine down. King thinks that injustice just exists and tension must be created with directaction to negotiate with the machine. Thoreau explians, If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go, let it go: perchance it will wear smooth,-certainly that machine will wear out, but if it is of such a naturethat it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another , then, Isay, break the law. Let your life be a counter friction to stop themachine. (Henry David Thoreau, p.587).Injustice is a cause of friction, which is brought on by the government. The government has created something that is working against itself; if thefriction of the injustice is left alone it will continue to grind down the machine. Once again Thoreau questions if you can wait that long and what are youpersonally going to do about the injustice. Thoreau says use your life to stop themachine. Dr. King ex plains, injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality tied in a single garment ofdestiny. Whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly (King p.516). If weallow injustice to affect any one place the government knows they can get awaywith it. If people dont fight injustice the government will continue to allow itbecause they know they can get away with it. We are all tied together in a mutualdestiny; we are all in the same boat, what ever affects you affects me. How canyou sit and watch injustice happen, we are all connected; what injustice happensto me happens to you. Both Thoreau and King are trying to prove the point thatwe are our brothers keeper. We all need to fight injustice to save each other. .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce , .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .postImageUrl , .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce , .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce:hover , .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce:visited , .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce:active { border:0!important; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce:active , .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ub0c755640528edd5e9fa4301d3100bce:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Ancient mariner EssayThoreau and King have said what role conscience plays for them and thatinjustice exists but you must use your conscience to decide what to do. Now theydiscuss just and unjust laws. Thoreau explains,unjust laws exist: Shall we be content to obey them, or shall weendeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, orshall we transgress them at once. ( Henry David Thoreau, p.586) Thoreau is acknowledging that unjust laws exist. I think he figured likethe sun rises every morning there will be unjust laws. How you deal with them ifyou do not approve of them is the question. Thoreau asks, will you be happy tojust obey the law for as long as it tak es to change the law by the governmentsrules?Do you want immediate acton? If you follow the governments rules it willtake a very long time to appeal the unjust law in court and they still may notchange the law. Can you wait that long?Or, should you take drastic direct actionto be heard at once. Are you willing to be arrested? Can you handle theresponsibility for your actions, or are you scared. Thoreau is impleying that youshould not wine about something inless you are ready and able to take theconciquinces. Dr. King explains how he justifies breaking some laws andfollowing others; the fact is there are simply two types of laws. Dr. King explainsthere are, just and unjust laws, One has not only a legal, but moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law ofGod. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of Saint Thomas Aguinas, and unjust law is ahuman law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law. Any law thatuplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades humanpersonality is unjust. ( Dr. King p.519-520).King is saying that just laws should be obeyed because they are the law and theyare morally right. Morally right is being or acting in accordance with establishedstandards of good behavior. So, if a law is legal and good you should fallow it. People should not follow unjust laws because they are wrong; you owe it toyourself morally. A just law is one that God would O.K; God is all loving, blindto any indifference and will forgive. The constitution says that all men are createdequeal; so therefore if the law is not the same to everyone, it is not a just law. Ifanyone is dehumanized it is an unjust law. Plain and simple, an unjust lawmakes you feel bad about who or what you are . A just law should make you feelequal and proud to be a human being. While Thoreau focuses on what you mightdo about a law, Dr. King focuses on what makes a law just or unjust. Thoreauknows there are unjust laws; I believe he thinks as long as laws exist there willalways be the possibility of being unjust laws. Thoreau says yes, unjust laws existbut what are you going to do, just sit there or fight. Dr. King is trying to get in tothe heads of his fellow clergyman that unjust laws are morally wrong. But theyboth want to get the point across that you must do something to change unjustlaws because they are wrong and can take your God given freedom away. Even though both writers are writing on ways to be civil but disobedient, they have oppositeways of convincing you. Their concepts are similar but their approaches are totally opposite. Dr. .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc , .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .postImageUrl , .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc , .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc:hover , .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc:visited , .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc:active { border:0!important; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc:active , .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u02df92ae15e82871c36e08f09143a0bc:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Forensic psychology EssayKings religious and moderate tone are totally different from Thoreaus intense hatred forauthority, mostly the government. They both want to point a finger at the government. Thoreaubelieves the best government is one which governs the least. Dr. King believes the principles ofgovernment are necessary to keep order, but need to live up to All men are created equal. Theunderlying meaning that I got from reading both essays was that you should follow your heartand your conscience against injustice and unjust laws, no matter what approach you choose totake. Works Cited:Letter from Birmingham Jail Dr. Martin Luther KingCivil Disobedience- by ThoreauPhilosophy

Two significant events of Christianity

Introduction In the history and tradition of Christianity, there are two very significant events. One of these is the role played by Martin Luther in the Protestant reformation.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Two significant events of Christianity specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The other important concept concerns mysticism in Christian practice. The first part of this paper deals with the role played by Martin Luther in inspiring exodus from the Roman Catholic Church. The second part deals with the practice of Christian mysticism and some of the defenses put forth by mystics. Martin Luther and the Protestant Reformation The Protestant Reformation was born in Germany after a catholic monk (Martin Luther) posted rhetorical works popularly referred to as ‘the 95 Theses,’ which appealed for the transformation of the Christian Church (Somervill 96). Martin Luther was born in 1483, in a town known as E isleben, in Germany. He grew to become one of the most influential controversial people in the history of the Church. Though he was relatively unknown in his early years as a monk, Luther gained recognition in 1517 after authoring a manuscript that was perceived to attack some of the doctrines practiced in the Roman Catholic Church such as absolution of sin, which he accused of entailing the purchase of ‘indulgences.’ In his ‘95 Theses,’ Luther emphasized the centrality of the Bible to religious conviction. He asserted that human salvation could be achieved only via faith and not by deeds. That document marked the beginning of the Protestant Reformation. Despite the fact that those ideas existed before Luther, he publicized them at a time when people were ready to challenge the power of the Roman Catholic Church (Hastings 244). At the time of his writing, Christians had started questioning the apparent over the involvement of the papacy in worldly matters r ather than the spiritual needs of his followers. Luther’s, writings significantly transformed the way Christianity was practiced. The nature of the revolution instigated by Luther was literary. In the ’95 Theses,’ Luther argued that the faithful ought to seek God’s forgiveness by faith. That was contrary to the Roman Catholic Church teachings about faith and good works being essential for salvation. He also raised concerns about the authority bestowed upon the Papacy. A different point raised by Luther in his document concerned the equality of Christians in the eyes of the Church. He believed that Christian faithful did not require priests and bishops for the interpretation of the Bible. He tucked the documents to the door of a church in Wittenberg. The author of this paper agrees with Luther that there should be only one source of authority in the Christian faith. This authority is God. All believers are equal in the eyes of the Lord and no one should pe rceive himself better than the other. Christians ought to be allowed to read the Bible on their own and decide for themselves the meanings therein.Advertising Looking for essay on religion theology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Even after his excommunication by the pope in 1520, the writings of Luther gained much popularity due to the growing popularity of the printing press in his time. He was put on trial and proclaimed an outlaw by Emperor Charles V after which he had to go into exile. It was during his exile that he interpreted the Bible into German. Most of the changes that Luther advocated for were implemented during his lifetime. For instance, he came from exile and found that priests dressed in regular clothes and were referred to as ministers. Some clergy had even begun to commit to matrimony. Rather than advocate for changes from within the Roman Catholic Church, Luther’s followers started calling themselv es the Lutherans. The message of reform carried by Luther resonated well with various sections of discontented Christians for other reasons besides spirituality. Some western political figures accepted the Lutheran way due to their resentment for the political authority accorded to the papacy. Merchants supported the reform due to their loathing for the taxes imposed by the Roman Catholic Church. In his dissent with some of the practices of the Roman Catholic Church, Luther did not consider joining the Eastern Orthodox Church probably due to the similarities in doctrines shared between the denominations. That was despite the fact that he had a relatively positive view of the Orthodox Church. The support was mostly because the Eastern Orthodox Church also denounced priestly celibacy, purgatory, supremacy of the pope, and indulgences among other practices. It was worth noting that some followers of Martin Luther indeed got in touch with the Orthodox Church patriarch Jeremias II. That effort did not bear much fruit and was later abandoned. While Luther’s early texts initiated the Protestant Reformation, he was barely engaged in it through the years that followed. Luther became more atrocious in his opinion claiming that the pope was an antichrist and allowed polygamy based on the Old Testament tradition observed by the patriarchs. However, the most stringent of Luther’s views was his advocacy for the ejection of Jews from Germany, which many people saw as one of the reasons that led to the Holocaust (Bainton 273). During the Holocaust, over one million Jews were killed. The views propagated Jews played a significant role in the way his followers perceived Jews and may have contributed to the Holocaust.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Two significant events of Christianity specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Christian Mysticism The concept of Christian mysticism is used in reference to the growth of mystical traditions and mystical theory within Christianity (McColman 23). Christian mysticism is usually linked with mystical theology that is often practiced in the Roman Catholic Church and Eastern orthodox practices. Christian mystics study and practice their faith based on ecstatic visions about the coming together of the human soul with God. They also observe prayerful contemplation of the Bible. In this regard, mysticism means the spirituality offered by seeking direct involvement with God. The life of the mystic is rooted in religion not just as an accepted belief, but on a level in which the believer seeks direct experience with deity. Due to the constant criticism of their unique way of praying and practicing their religion, Christian mystics often feel the need to justify themselves and the authenticity of their practice. They justify their ritualistic ways of offering prayers as a fundamental routine in any religious practice. Prayers such ‘the Lo rd’s prayer’ are traced to the times of Christ, and are used to justify mechanically repeated prayers performed by the mystics. In Mathew 6:7, Jesus reminds his followers not to heap too much praise in prayer like the gentiles and not to use too many words in prayer. Another practice defended by mystics is that of secluded meditation aimed at building a spiritual connection with God. Though some mystical practices such as protracted periods of seclusion and self-annihilation seem extreme, their philosophy of seeking a personal relationship with deity is understandable. The author of this paper perceives Christian mysticism as a noble way of practicing faith in a close and direct experience with God. However, it appears to contradict the Christian doctrine that God resides in all believers. All Christians can obtain experience with God only by believing in Jesus Christ. Christian mysticism appears to want to capture spiritual experiences that cannot be attained by intel lectual techniques or by reading the Bible. It seeks to do this by encouraging its followers to emulate Christ. However, the Bible teaches that likeness to Jesus Christ can only be attained through dying of the self rather than trying to emulate him. 1 Corinthians 2:14 also teaches that spiritual truth can only be understood via the intellect, directed by the Holy Spirit (who dwells in all faithful). The history of the Christian church is adorned with various mystics like Teresa of à vila, who employs allegories of irrigating a garden and taking a tour of the chambers in a castle to illuminate how meditation encourages a union with God. Others like Ignatius Loyola, Johann Arndt and Lorenzo Scupoli play major roles in advocating for meditations and secluded prayer aimed at seeking direct experience with God. Mystic practice in Christianity or any other religion is an indication of devotion and search of spiritual perfection.Advertising Looking for essay on religion theology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More However, I do not see myself becoming a mystic due to the controversies surrounding their practice. I am a Buddhist who believes in meditation that is not intended for union with deity. Buddhist meditation is a procedure that nurtures and improves awareness, clarity, emotional positivity, and a composed perception of the true makeup of things. Conclusion Martin Luther was undoubtedly one of the most important figures in the history of the Christian church. The role played by his writings in the protestant reformation shaped Christianity as it is practiced today. However, the perceived role played by some of his rhetorical works on the violence witnessed against Jews during the Holocaust was quite unfortunate. This paper also elaborated the practice of Christian mysticism. Though some mystic practices appeared extreme, most of them were geared towards establishing a union with God. Works Cited Bainton, Roland. Here I Stand: A Life of Martin Luther, Massachusetts: Hendrickson Publishe rs, 2009. Print. Hastings, Adrian. A World History of Christianity, United Kingdom: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2000. Print. McColman, Carl. The Big Book of Christian Mysticism: The Essential Guide to Contemplative Spirituality, Charlottesville, VA: Hampton Roads Publishing, 2010. Print. Somervill, Barbara. Martin Luther: Father of the Reformation, Minneapolis: Capstone, 2006. Print. This essay on Two significant events of Christianity was written and submitted by user Adelynn P. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Abortion Essays (1761 words) - Human Pregnancy, Abortion, Fertility

Abortion Essays (1761 words) - Human Pregnancy, Abortion, Fertility Abortion arah Park Assignment #2 Rewrite December 9th 1998 During the past century, abortion has joined race and war as one of the most debatable subjects of controversy in the United States. The issue of abortion causes discussions about human interactions where ethics, emotions and law come together. There are many reasons why women decide to have abortions. Some women have abortions because of health complications, some have marital problems, and some lack responsibility. Whatever the reasons a woman decides to have an abortion, it seems only justified that she should be able to make decisions in regards to her life and body. The decisions that she makes in regards to what she does with her body and the fetus will be beneficial to both the woman and the fetus because it will prevent many problems from occurring in the future. If a woman were to have an unwanted baby, she may neglect or even abuse the child causing the child to go into the care of the government. Bringing an unwanted child into the world is unfair to the innocent child and the woman. The government has no valid reason in bringing an unwanted life into the world. Bringing an unwanted child into the world is not helpful to the parents, the child and the government, because if the parents cannot take care of the child, eventually, the government will be responsible for the child. The right to have an abortion is personal and essential to a womans life, because having a baby in ones life causes dramatic changes. Pregnancy and childbirth can prevent women from keeping and getting jobs. When women are pregnant many employers do not want to hire them because when the woman has a baby, the company or employer must still pay her for the time that she is out of work by law. Also, raising a baby and providing for all the needs that a child has is a lot of money, which can create an insufficient income for many women. Another factor that imposes on women when they have children is the amount of time they have for themselves and others beyond the baby. Women feel that it prevents them from providing services for others and time for themselves. Sometimes after a pregnancy and childbirth, many women have to give up their dreams on starting in school or end up dropping out because they do not have the time for it. They have to give up on something that will significantly influence her family and her future. Pregnancy has a great impact on the womans future and her future relationship with her family. In many cases of unwanted pregnancies, the women are not married. These women inmost cases cannot go home and announce that they are pregnant and be proud of it. Their pregnancy would be am embarrassment and disgrace to the family. Some families would suggest to the pregnant woman about disowning her, throwing her out of the house, and cutting off family communications and wealth. Many of these women cannot deal with loosing their family and the new lifestyle that they have to face. So in order to prevent losing their family and leading a tough life, they look into the option of abortion. Women should have the choice of deciding what would be best for their future, whether or not they are ready to change their lifestyle and decide the relationship between themselves and their family. A woman is equal to a man. But during a pregnancy, when the woman does not have the choice to abort the fetus growing inside of her, she is not his equal. A man can simply withdraw from a relationship as soon as he finds out about a pregnancy. He has the choice of staying and supporting the pregnant woman, or the choice of leaving her and the development of a new life. He can simply say a sentence or pick up his bags and leave while a whole new life is growing inside of her, a life that she cannot get rid of unless she has professional help. Without the choice of abortion, a woman does not have the same choices that a man would have. With the right to have

Creative Teams and Creative Conflicts Assignment

Creative Teams and Creative Conflicts - Assignment Example In such a situation, Puccio, Mance and Murdock (2011) note that organizational conflicts may be very common. Despite the differences in creative thinking styles, the group could improve their process by following these three principles. In the first place, the group should have talked about their unique differences to create a sense of identity among each other. This is because where there is an understanding of identities it is easier to accommodate other people (Grivas and Puccio, 2012). Secondly, based on the differences in identities, the group should have broken their job down into tasks and assigned compatible thinkers to different jobs. Finally, the group should have had a standby conflict resolution team that would have been responsible for managing all conflicts from the very unset that they showed up. Into the future, it is expected that the process would be approached differently so as to lead to group success. For instance if I was in charge of leadership, I would have used the strategic accommodation skill to ensure that each person appreciated the place of the other person in the collective realization of the organizational goal (Prichard, n.d.). Puccio, G. J. (2006). Tapping into our creative thinking skills to manage complex problems [Powerpoint]. Faculty Institute on Teaching and Learning-RIT, International Center for Studies in Creativity,State University of New York, Buffalo State. Retrieved from https://www2.rit.edu/fitl/presentations_2006/TappingIntoCreativeThinkingSkills.pdf Puccio, G. J., Mance, M., & Murdock, M. C. (2011). Psychological diversity: Leading people with different styles. In Puccio, Mance, & Murdock, Creative leadership: Skills that drive change (pp. 241–264). Los Angeles, CA:

Security Policy Brief on Mexico Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Security Policy Brief on Mexico - Essay Example There has been a continuous increase in number of tourists making visiting Mexico in the past few decades. This makes tourism one of the main foreign exchange earners for the Mexican economy (Joyce, pg68). The rich culture of the Mexican people that have remained an altered by the technology has been the magnet to the people from all walks of life. However, the country of Mexico has its ugly picture that has for the past two decades given its neighbors and even the world a headache and sleepless night. It is known for transition groups, also known as cartels. These groups have smeared the beautiful image of Mexico with dirt through their illegal and heinous acts. According to the national system in charge of the public security in Mexico, the level of violence in the country has been on the rise for the past few years. In the year 2006, there were 10253 murders on the record, 11806 in 2007, 16811 in 2008, and 22480 murders in the year 2009. The masterminds of these deaths are the cartels who manslaughter the innocent civilian who stand on the way of the illegal activities. The center of conflict in this country revolves around the drug business. There is a lot of disagreement, competition and rivalry in the performance within the restrained drug routes and markets amongst the cartels. The outcome of the conflicts is a violent campaign of one group against the other. The other thorn on the wound has been the deployment of the military personnel by the government to end the drug business across the country’s border. This has not resolved the violence problem since the military uses force and fire exchange to control the cartels activiti es, hence contributing to the crises. As the aspect of jealousy continues to dominate in this drug related activities, other social crimes have cropped up. Their effects have left no segment of the society immune. The violence has given birth to the practices such as criminal gangs